|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Nov 4, 2015 18:29:14 GMT -8
Yeah, just like I figured.
A waste of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Nov 5, 2015 5:13:27 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Nov 5, 2015 8:33:12 GMT -8
Of course, fudged data and suppression of contradictory information is of no consequence.
Good day.
|
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Nov 5, 2015 18:05:07 GMT -8
You know what?
I didn't "fudge" a thing.
I don 't have to play the old "take an established fact and "fudge" it with dmi store ridicule.
I don't have to try to make a comedy out of a situation that's tragedy.
I don't have to argue something just because it's the policics.
I'll do one-on-one, right now, with the facts you've got and the facts I've got.
Come on, 101.
Bring it on.
Let's hear what you're saying against what the majority of scientists all over this planet and what I'm saying.
Bring it on.
Let's dance.
|
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Nov 5, 2015 20:20:59 GMT -8
Calm down, you'll give yourself an aneurism.
Breathe...
First off, no one said YOU fudged anything.
Secondly, if you think your "facts" haven't been politicized, you are delusional.
Lastly, the "majority" of scientists is meaningless since science isn't done by consensus but by empirical proof.
If you haven't heard about all the falsified data and suppression of contradictory evidence and opinion by "the majority" (or perhaps more importantly, their funders) in this matter you are simply uninformed.
"Let's dance."
No thanks, you clearly have two left feet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sailor on Nov 6, 2015 11:36:07 GMT -8
Lawmaker Claims NOAA Altered Climate Change Data, Issues Rare Subpoena for Internal Research DocsA key House chairman and climate change skeptic is extending a months-long clash with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration by issuing an unusual subpoena seeking internal scientific research documents that the agency considers confidential. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, first requested documents from NOAA in July, following publication of a peer-reviewed study by Tom Karl, director of the agency’s National Centers for Environmental Information. It concluded that the rate of global warming during the last 15 years has been as fast as, or faster, than that seen during the latter half of the 20th century, according to a NOAA spokesman. That would refute the notion offered by some that global warming has slowed in recent years. Arguing that other scientific studies contradict that conclusion, Smith followed up with further requests for NOAA documents and with meetings and emails between congressional and agency staff. Their inability to reach an agreement on the completeness of the document record prompted the Oct. 13 subpoena to NOAA Administrator Kathryn Sullivan. “It was inconvenient for this administration that climate data has clearly showed no warming for the past two decades,” Smith said in a statement. “The American people have every right to be suspicious when NOAA alters data to get the politically correct results they want and then refuses to reveal how those decisions were made. NOAA needs to come clean about why they altered the data to get the results they needed to advance this administration’s extreme climate change agenda. The agency has yet to identify any legal basis for withholding these documents. The committee intends to use all tools at its disposal to undertake its constitutionally-mandated oversight responsibilities.” More: www.govexec.com/oversight/2015/11/lawmaker-claims-noaa-altered-climate-change-data-issues-rare-subpoena-internal-research-docs/123449/
|
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Nov 7, 2015 4:44:07 GMT -8
As I said:
Yeah, just like I figured.
A waste of time.
Remember this conversation, because I think you're going to see it recurring for the rest of your life, whether you like it or not.
We are done here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sailor on Nov 11, 2015 16:52:33 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Nov 12, 2015 19:42:56 GMT -8
I've said for years, it's about two things, money and control. No one's proven me wrong yet. |
|
