|
Post by youngstown on Apr 25, 2007 13:55:48 GMT -8
Drudge states that he will be responsible for ALL schools being exposed to his Global Warming film. The government announced that the Anti-Global Warming DVD will be subject to serious penalities if it contained innaccuracies...........He' also planning on running again. Personally, I pleased he didn't win the first time.
|
|
|
Post by Sailor on Apr 25, 2007 17:01:44 GMT -8
Drudge states that he will be responsible for ALL schools being exposed to his Global Warming film. The government announced that the Anti-Global Warming DVD will be subject to serious penalities if it contained innaccuracies...........He' also planning on running again. Personally, I pleased he didn't win the first time. "Subject to heavy penalties if it contained inaccuracies." Hmmm. I wonder if Britain will actually acknowledge any "inaccuracies" (bald faced lies) that are brought forward. Somehow I doubt it.
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Apr 25, 2007 19:02:55 GMT -8
Sailor: I didn't make myself clear. There's an English Anti-Gore, Anti-GW production that they intent to target. Not Gores film.
|
|
|
Post by MARIO on Apr 26, 2007 0:13:03 GMT -8
Drudge states that he will be responsible for ALL schools being exposed to his Global Warming film. The government announced that the Anti-Global Warming DVD will be subject to serious penalities if it contained innaccuracies...........He' also planning on running again. Personally, I pleased he didn't win the first time. At the same time, the Brits have no problem extracting the Holocaust from the school curriculum for fear of offending Muslims. Fred Thompson actually has a good article out on that issue today.
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Apr 26, 2007 18:46:53 GMT -8
Mario: I think Thompson and Lieberman are the winning ticket.
|
|
|
Post by MARIO on Apr 26, 2007 18:58:54 GMT -8
Mario: I think Thompson and Lieberman are the winning ticket. You know what, I'd prefer a Thompson-Guiliani ticket. But Lieberman as VP is something I could definitely get behind.
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Apr 26, 2007 19:36:33 GMT -8
Mario: Lieberman brings in the Independents, Blue Dogs, and Most Thinking elephants. With Fred's health being of some minor concern, a strong running mate is immperative. You're from NYC, I think your "favorite son" prejudice is showing............I see your posting on the Drug Industry was poofed on THC.
|
|
|
Post by MrDoublel on Apr 27, 2007 9:49:30 GMT -8
Thompson, Guiliani or Lieberman, any one of them is 2-3 times the man of any of the democratic candidates...except maybe Hillary, she's more man than many men...
|
|
|
Post by jfree on Apr 27, 2007 11:18:25 GMT -8
How about Thompson Powell, now that I could definately live w/.
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Apr 27, 2007 11:59:50 GMT -8
Jfree: You pulled a good one out of the hat! But Powell considers his personal and family life all important.....he'd have to be drafted again.
|
|
|
Post by MrDoublel on Apr 30, 2007 7:14:07 GMT -8
I think Powell lacks the backbone needed to make the kind of decisions made at that level. I just think he isn't cut out to be an effective political leader. No doubt he's a politician, you have to be to get to the level he did. But a leader? I don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Apr 30, 2007 7:19:12 GMT -8
sfcLL: He's always been deferential to the commander in chief...military background. That's a positive aspect for a Vice President?
|
|
|
Post by MrDoublel on Apr 30, 2007 9:22:29 GMT -8
In my book he needs to possess leadership qualities too, just in case. I don't want any Dan Quales in the VP's seat again.
|
|
|
Post by MARIO on Apr 30, 2007 9:30:56 GMT -8
Mario: Lieberman brings in the Independents, Blue Dogs, and Most Thinking elephants. With Fred's health being of some minor concern, a strong running mate is immperative. You're from NYC, I think your "favorite son" prejudice is showing............I see your posting on the Drug Industry was poofed on THC. I forgot about that post. Typical of them to delete it. Guiliani is a moderate Republican. With him being on the ticket, you acquire votes from law-enforcement. Law-enforcement unions are huge supporters of the Democrats. Guiliani could also bring in many Catholics, a constituency with which Republicans have made great strides in the last few years. Take care.
|
|
|
Post by cataracts on May 1, 2007 2:05:38 GMT -8
Mario: Lieberman brings in the Independents, Blue Dogs, and Most Thinking elephants. With Fred's health being of some minor concern, a strong running mate is immperative. You're from NYC, I think your "favorite son" prejudice is showing............I see your posting on the Drug Industry was poofed on THC. I forgot about that post. Typical of them to delete it. Guiliani is a moderate Republican. With him being on the ticket, you acquire votes from law-enforcement. Law-enforcement unions are huge supporters of the Democrats. Guiliani could also bring in many Catholics, a constituency with which Republicans have made great strides in the last few years. Take care. Mario, If the Catholics vote Pro-life, Guiliani hasn't got a prayer. He's as bloodthirsty for babies as your average democrat. C.
|
|