Post by americanpride on Jul 31, 2005 20:25:35 GMT -8
Russia has no interest in the affairs of Asia beyond the Korean Peninsula, lacking the political clout and military projection capabilities to be much of an influence beyond its own borders.
Russia's policy interests are in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and the Caucasus (however that's spelled). Russia would sit out a US-Sino conflict and hope to pick up the economic scraps in Korea, Europe and Central Asia.
I wouldn't expect the Middle East to go up in flames - it already is. Israel can defend herself, having consistently defeated numerous Arab states over the last several decades. Israel has unequal economic, political, and military advantages over her adversaries.
I'd expect US investment in the Central Asian and South Asian states to increase. Tajikistan, Pakistan, India, and so on. These states are already critical to the War on Terrorism, and could be easily transitioned into operations against China, given their proximity.
The decisive regions would be Korea and Central Asia, not Taiwan. Taiwan may be the flashpoint, but it would not be strategically decisive for either party. Whoever controls the Korean Peninsula controls East Asia, and whoever controls Central Asia, controls the Middle East. We do not need to repeat the importance of those regions.
A land invasion of China would be impossible, simply because of China's sheer size. The objective would have to be the destruction of China as a coherent political, economic, and military unit rather than its occupation. Because any victory would have to be enduring in order to avoid another war, we would have to see to it that the Chinese government is changed to one that is more friendly. This could only be done with native elements inside China sympathetic to democracy and America.
I'd also expect the usage of special weapons in the Korean theater.
Russia's policy interests are in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and the Caucasus (however that's spelled). Russia would sit out a US-Sino conflict and hope to pick up the economic scraps in Korea, Europe and Central Asia.
I wouldn't expect the Middle East to go up in flames - it already is. Israel can defend herself, having consistently defeated numerous Arab states over the last several decades. Israel has unequal economic, political, and military advantages over her adversaries.
I'd expect US investment in the Central Asian and South Asian states to increase. Tajikistan, Pakistan, India, and so on. These states are already critical to the War on Terrorism, and could be easily transitioned into operations against China, given their proximity.
The decisive regions would be Korea and Central Asia, not Taiwan. Taiwan may be the flashpoint, but it would not be strategically decisive for either party. Whoever controls the Korean Peninsula controls East Asia, and whoever controls Central Asia, controls the Middle East. We do not need to repeat the importance of those regions.
A land invasion of China would be impossible, simply because of China's sheer size. The objective would have to be the destruction of China as a coherent political, economic, and military unit rather than its occupation. Because any victory would have to be enduring in order to avoid another war, we would have to see to it that the Chinese government is changed to one that is more friendly. This could only be done with native elements inside China sympathetic to democracy and America.
I'd also expect the usage of special weapons in the Korean theater.