|
|
Post by youngstown on Jul 24, 2014 18:01:41 GMT -8
Territories, like Puerto Rico, subject to US Law. Their resources could supplement the strain on the US taxpayer and work in harmony with the US Constitution. Our Homeland Security folks are well trained in citizen control, and would do a fine job...south of the Border.  |
|
|
|
Post by Sailor on Jul 25, 2014 10:11:41 GMT -8
Hey bro! Good to see you posting here.
Personally I think the majority in Homeland Security are bullies and other lightweights who wouldn't stand much of a chance against the various cartels and gangs like MS-13.
|
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Aug 16, 2014 19:35:10 GMT -8
Sailor, send em south and let them meet their destiny. It might make men of some of em. Obama may memorialize those who paid the full price for his open border.  |
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Aug 17, 2014 11:51:33 GMT -8
Sailor, send em south and let them meet their destiny. It might make men of some of em. Obama may memorialize those who paid the full price for his open border. How about we send Obama south? He can take Biden and Holder with him for companionship. |
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Sept 29, 2014 15:10:31 GMT -8
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh, GAWD, THAT was unquestionably the funniest thread I've seen here! So, what'll we do with 118 MILLION MEXICANS? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MexicoOr maybe you only mean Central America proper? That's 43 MILLION. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_AmericaBUT IF YOU MEAN BOTH, THAT'S 161 MILLION PEOPLE, OR EQUIVALENT TO ALMOST HALF THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES.
"Their resources could supplement the strain on the US taxpayer and work in harmony with the US Constitution."
Right.
The vast majority of those 161 million people are ALREADY dirt poor. As if taking Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California, and parts of Oregon and Colorado from Mexico at gunpoint wasn't enough....
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Cession
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_of_Mexico_Movement
Oh, and just one more thing....
Since I KNOW that full U.S. citizenship, and voting, isn't part of this.....
"Non-citizen U.S. nationals may reside and work in the United States without restrictions, and may apply for citizenship under the same rules as resident aliens. Like resident aliens, they are not presently allowed by any U.S. state to vote in federal or state elections, although, as with resident aliens, there is no constitutional prohibition against their doing so." ALSO.... " Like U.S. citizens, non-citizen U.S. nationals may transmit their non-citizen U.S. nationality to children born abroad, although the rules are somewhat different than for U.S. citizens."[35] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_nationality_law#Nationals_who_are_not_citizens161 million?!?Oh Yeah, go right ahead and get to "annexing" them. "Citizen control"?
Better plan on bringing back the draft.....
|
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Sept 30, 2014 5:52:03 GMT -8
Glad you got a belly laugh there, Warrior.
Not a lot to laugh about these days.
|
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Sept 30, 2014 15:44:37 GMT -8
Glad you got a belly laugh there, Warrior. Not a lot to laugh about these days. The laughter was sarcastic, I assure you.  |
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Oct 22, 2014 17:36:49 GMT -8
The south west was inhabited by SPAINARDS Under Spanish & French Dominions. The United States of Mexico was invented in the mid 1800's. Most Mexicans are not Spanish, but a mixture of the indigenous population. The rights they claim are those of Spanish Americans, which they are not. As to a solution to the problem? All 11-20 million should be harboured in internment camps in Alaska until their time before the judiciary. That is, unless they decide to return on their own. PLANEFARE not WELFARE.  |
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Oct 22, 2014 17:38:37 GMT -8
Glad you got a belly laugh there, Warrior. Not a lot to laugh about these days. The laughter was sarcastic, I assure you. So I gathered. |
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Oct 24, 2014 1:53:18 GMT -8
"The rights they claim are those of Spanish Americans, which they are not. As to a solution to the problem? All 11-20 million should be harboured in internment camps in Alaska until their time before the judiciary. That is, unless they decide to return on their own. PLANEFARE not WELFARE." That is NOT what the original thread was talking about. You were talking about "annexing Central America", as the title clearly states.
The rights of the 161 million people you were ORIGINALLY talking about, under your U.S. "annexation" of Central America, are the rights that those 161 million people would HAVE....
as U.S. NATIIONALS,
NOT U.S. CITIZENS,
... and according to U.S. LAW, if this country tried to "annex" Mexico and Central America as TERRITORIES of the UNITED STATES.
Remember your words:
"Territories, like Puerto Rico, subject to US Law. Their resources could supplement the strain on the US taxpayer and work in harmony with the US Constitution. Our Homeland Security folks are well trained in citizen control, and would do a fine job...south of the Border." The people who inhabit U.S territories like Puerto Rico are U. S. NATIONALS, and U.S. nationals have RIGHTS. EXAMPLES: " Non-citizen U.S. nationals may reside and work in the United States without restrictions, and may apply for citizenship under the same rules as resident aliens. Like resident aliens, they are not presently allowed by any U.S. state to vote in federal or state elections, although, as with resident aliens, there is no constitutional prohibition against their doing so." ALSO.... "Like U.S. citizens, non-citizen U.S. nationals may transmit their non-citizen U.S. nationality to children born abroad, although the rules are somewhat different than for U.S. citizens." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_nationality_law#Nationals_who_are_not_citizensYeah. YOUR WORDS. " SUBJECT TO U.S. LAW." It was YOUR idea, Youngstown, and the ORIGINAL thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by youngstown on Oct 25, 2014 8:39:24 GMT -8
The USA has been invaded & occupied, by the US of Mexico, and its lawless, envious cohorts. Critic with no solution, as usual, Warrior. So john Kerry of you. |
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Oct 26, 2014 2:15:22 GMT -8
I never said I had a "solution". If it were THAT easy, the problem would have been SOLVED a LONG time ago.
You don't have any "solutions", either. You can't even defend the original "solution" that this Looney Tunes thread is based upon, so you are reduced to baseless partisan attacks, as usual, in your failed attempt to fight a verbal rearguard action to cover your retreat from your original "solution". ...And I haven't even begun to take apart your Alaskan Auschwitz "solution". " All 11-20 million should be harboured in internment camps in Alaska until their time before the judiciary." THAT one is almost as "funny" as your original "solution"....
....But not quite.
One Final Solution at a time...
|
|
|
|
Post by Sailor on Oct 26, 2014 7:01:41 GMT -8
Does anyone reading this thread have a comment to make on the rumor going around that the administration is gearing up to grant amnesty on Obama's executive order of up to 34 million illegals right after the election is over?
If he does, 2 questions ...
(1) Is it legal? Does he have the Constitutional authority?
(2) If it's not legal, what can be done to stop it?
Or is it a case of "If the President does it, it's not illegal." - "Tricky Dick" Nixon to David Frost
I think you guys know my opinion on the subject, at least on question #1. I have my opinion on #2 as well, but I want to hear yours before I trot mine out.
|
|
|
|
Post by warrior1972 on Oct 26, 2014 7:46:32 GMT -8
Does anyone reading this thread have a comment to make on the rumor going around that the administration is gearing up to grant amnesty on Obama's executive order of up to 34 million illegals right after the election is over? If he does, 2 questions ... (1) Is it legal? Does he have the Constitutional authority? (2) If it's not legal, what can be done to stop it? Or is it a case of "If the President does it, it's not illegal." - "Tricky Dick" Nixon to David Frost I think you guys know my opinion on the subject, at least on question #1. I have my opinion on #2 as well, but I want to hear yours before I trot mine out. I'll wait and see if he does it, and how lt unfolds if he does. But I don't think he will. One thing, however....
The damned BORDER needs to be SECURE.
What the hell good is it to secure other nations' borders when we can't even secure California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas? We've been running a defense budget higher than the next 25 countries put together for over a damned decade, but won't commit to our own border security?!?
THEN we can start talking about dealing with those who are in our country illegally.
It is not a solution.
It IS a SUGGESTION. |
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Oct 26, 2014 20:14:30 GMT -8
One thing, however....
The damned BORDER needs to be SECURE.
What the hell good is it to secure other nations' borders when we can't even secure California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas? We've been running a defense budget higher than the next 25 countries put together for over a damned decade, but won't commit to our own border security?!?"
100% agree.
|
|
