|
Post by warrior1972 on Nov 24, 2014 18:30:37 GMT -8
(CNN) -- When plans were announced to build a giant new transoceanic canal across Nicaragua, the young Hong Kong businessman leading the project acknowledged the widespread skepticism. "We don't want it to become an international joke," said Wang Jing, a 40-year-old with no significant engineering experience and a background he described as "very normal." That was in June 2013, when the Nicaraguan legislature, controlled by President Daniel Ortega, had just allowed Wang to move forward with his five-year project . It is not certain that the canal, which would be one of the most ambitious and expensive engineering projects on Earth, will ever get built. But it looks set to move forward, and even some of the most determined doubters are starting to reconsider. Last Thursday, the government and Wang's company, Nicaragua Canal Development Investment, announced that construction will start on Dec. 22. The development's estimated price tag -- $50 billion -- is four times the size of the entire Nicaraguan economy. The canal itself would be deeper, wider and longer than the Panama Canal, just a few hundred miles to the south. The Panama Canal's expansion is almost ready, which raises the question of why another costly canal is needed. The Nicaraguan opposition has called the project the biggest scam in the country's history, and engineering experts are divided over whether the project is feasible. www.cnn.com/2014/11/24/opinion/ghitis-nicaragua-canal-project/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
|
|
|
Post by Sailor on Nov 27, 2014 7:35:45 GMT -8
Very good question. $50 billion sounds a bit cheap for the project, I'd have expected at least $250 billion in today's dollars.
The new expansion locks to the Panama Canal are due to come on line in 2016, there is no way short of using nuclear demolition charges to dig a new canal before that project is complete. Yes, that option was considered during the late 1950s-early 60s to replace the Panama Canal, recognized even then as being too small. That new canal would have been a sea level canal like the Suez Canal.
|
|