|
Post by Remey688 on Jul 20, 2005 15:29:58 GMT -8
Thank you for your views, other opinions on this really help me. The SSPX has a magazine, The Angelus, which has featured articles written by different authors on Distributism, the what, why's and how to's. I came to the conclusion it was an impractical theory that could never really work today. It might be an answer for some third world coutries, but not if they have a dictatorship form of govt. The idea of businessess cooperating, sharing business instead of competing might be a nice thougth, but I don't see the men involved (that I am aware of) with it actually getting past their click mentality, to make it truly work. Some of these people have visions of the guilds being restored. I'm really shocked that they think they can have their little 'villages', impliment their theories, without end up isolating themselves from society. Get this, a large number of the men I know who are working towards this ideal here in the place I live, I've always considered bigots, misogynists. Men who believe women need to be submissive. Is Distributism an adverbal form like Wal-Martist or -ism?!
|
|
|
Post by Merceditas on Jul 21, 2005 5:15:58 GMT -8
I suppose so............
|
|
|
Post by 101ABN on Jul 21, 2005 20:02:52 GMT -8
Stay in the game here.
|
|