|
Post by dstauffer on Mar 22, 2006 8:26:44 GMT -8
I was purusing the articles and viewpoints on NewsMax.com (I have never visited the site before) when I ran across this artice concerning "President" Bill...no,wait...err...Hill...wait...Hillary Clinton. According to this article, Her Royal Highness of the Left sent a letter to the president urging him to send...get this... troops to Darfur! This purported letter offers "13 ways in which you [the president] can take action." Hopefully, I am not the only one who is somewhat befuddled by this. Has anyone else heard of this story and could, perhaps, supply links to other sources. Here's a link to the article from NewsMax: www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/21/90143.shtml
|
|
|
Post by MrDoublel on Mar 22, 2006 9:48:20 GMT -8
Well, obviously she still thinks "We are the president"...
"Our continued failure on this issue is unacceptable," she declared.
But the failures of her regime...I mean, her HUSBANDS administration were acceptable?
|
|
|
Post by dstauffer on Mar 22, 2006 9:57:22 GMT -8
"But the failures of her regime...I mean, her HUSBANDS administration were acceptable?"
Failures of her husband's administration?! C'mon now, we all know who really was in-charge during the First Husband's tour-de-force...or is it tour-de-farce?
|
|
|
Post by dustdevil28 on Mar 23, 2006 7:08:46 GMT -8
More political posturing. It's obvious that we won't go into Darfur.
While the situation should be attended to we simply have more pressing issues and empress Hillary knows this.
|
|
|
Post by MrDoublel on Mar 23, 2006 11:38:24 GMT -8
Besides, the UN would hamstring and effort to rein in the killers out there. Soon as something happens they sit on their hands for fear of hurting some two bit tin pot dictator...Oops, that's who's calling the shots at the UN.
|
|
|
Post by dustdevil28 on Mar 23, 2006 15:02:20 GMT -8
Either that, or we could look forward to more news stories telling us how horrible we are for cleaning the situation up.
|
|