Post by 101ABN on Apr 26, 2005 18:47:55 GMT -8
Here's the latest effort to overturn the will of the voters in California.
MOST Californians do NOT support this crap. It never ceases to amaze me how they keep re-electing these assholes who do.
(CNSNews.com) -- Big crowds and high emotion are expected on Tuesday, when the California Assembly's Judiciary Committee takes up what Democrats are calling the "gender-neutral marriage bill."
Assembly Bill 19, officially known as The Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act, would amend the state's Family Code to define marriage as a civil contract between two persons, instead of a civil contract between a man and a woman.
Read more here:
www.gopusa.com/news/2005/april/0426_ca_marriagep.shtml
The title of this bill just kills me. The "Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act?" I defy anyone to tell me how this protects religious freedom (which would not require any additional protection if these clowns would leave the fucking Constitution alone and let it do what it was intended to do). Likewise, Civil Marriage is already defined by CA constitutional amendment as between one man and one woman and, likewise should require no further protection.
Yet another wave in the neo-com left's relentless assault on Judeo-Christian values in the war to make the perverse normative.
MOST Californians do NOT support this crap. It never ceases to amaze me how they keep re-electing these assholes who do.
(CNSNews.com) -- Big crowds and high emotion are expected on Tuesday, when the California Assembly's Judiciary Committee takes up what Democrats are calling the "gender-neutral marriage bill."
Assembly Bill 19, officially known as The Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act, would amend the state's Family Code to define marriage as a civil contract between two persons, instead of a civil contract between a man and a woman.
Read more here:
www.gopusa.com/news/2005/april/0426_ca_marriagep.shtml
The title of this bill just kills me. The "Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act?" I defy anyone to tell me how this protects religious freedom (which would not require any additional protection if these clowns would leave the fucking Constitution alone and let it do what it was intended to do). Likewise, Civil Marriage is already defined by CA constitutional amendment as between one man and one woman and, likewise should require no further protection.
Yet another wave in the neo-com left's relentless assault on Judeo-Christian values in the war to make the perverse normative.