|
|
Post by cameron on Jul 24, 2005 20:15:39 GMT -8
Do you really think that Vicente Fox's trash would fight for the U.S.? Hell, no, they would desert first opportunity. They don't come here for a job. They come here for the benefits that the lame liberals have made sure they can have. It's humane, and all that crap. Give me a break. Why should our military have to put up with garbage? They don't come here for jobs? Then what's the whole business about companies hiring illegals by the thousands? And you really think that out of millions of illegal immigrants absolutely none would take this opporutnity for advancement and acceptance? You can not hermetically seal borders, you need a better solution Read The Devil's Foyer
Michael Yon : Online Magazine“Why did you build a berm around Mosul?” I asked. Those first few seconds, while lacking much in the form of any concrete answers, were nonetheless telling. Some of the officers shifted about, and there was blinking and hesitation before the answers came, haltingly. And there was the "Well, throughout history, walls have not been very effective . . . any obstacle is only as good as the man guarding it.” One fact emerged: the “wall” was a contentious subject. But it was also clear that the berm was never meant to hermetically seal Mosul, but rather to canalize those 23 ratlines. People hauling munitions might be more apt to attempt the 11 main roads, and when they cut channels through the berm, they will telepath exactly which avenues are smuggling routes. |
|
|
|
Post by retire05 on Jul 25, 2005 19:24:06 GMT -8
Yeah, some do. So there are thousands being hired for less than minimum wage, then sending their little espousa's to apply for welfare. Double dipping, so to speak.
A lot of them come just for the benefits they can get. And they do get them.
What about the Mexicana who came here illegally so that her daughter could have heart surgery that they would not do in Mexico because the Mexican doctors said she would die within six months even with the surgery.
So here is this Mexicana, here illegally, with her daughter and the U of PA agrees to do surgery FREE. The surgery goes bad and now this illegal Mexicana is suing the U of PA for $6,000,000.00. At least the doctors here kept her daughter alive for two years. Of course, U of PA did not know she was illegal since federal law prohibits hospitals asking that question.
Jobs? Sometimes, but mostly for the benefits that they cannot get in Mexico. Fox dumps his unwanted trash on us. Kinda like when Castro emptied his prisons and put them on boats to the U.S. Can you think of a better way of getting rid of your unwanted than to help them sneak into the U.S.?
And the liberals scream if we bitch because we are having our asses taxed off to pay for these people.
|
|
|
|
Post by cameron on Jul 25, 2005 20:54:01 GMT -8
Yeah, some do. So there are thousands being hired for less than minimum wage, then sending their little espousa's to apply for welfare. Double dipping, so to speak. A lot of them come just for the benefits they can get. And they do get them. What about the Mexicana who came here illegally so that her daughter could have heart surgery that they would not do in Mexico because the Mexican doctors said she would die within six months even with the surgery. So here is this Mexicana, here illegally, with her daughter and the U of PA agrees to do surgery FREE. The surgery goes bad and now this illegal Mexicana is suing the U of PA for $6,000,000.00. At least the doctors here kept her daughter alive for two years. Of course, U of PA did not know she was illegal since federal law prohibits hospitals asking that question. Jobs? Sometimes, but mostly for the benefits that they cannot get in Mexico. Fox dumps his unwanted trash on us. Kinda like when Castro emptied his prisons and put them on boats to the U.S. Can you think of a better way of getting rid of your unwanted than to help them sneak into the U.S.? And the liberals scream if we bitch because we are having our asses taxed off to pay for these people. There are an estimated 8-10 million illegals in the country. To say there are not those here to game the system would be foolish but to suggest that the majority of them are here to game the system, instead of being here as economic refugees is also foolish. As much as you have convinced yourself that sealing the border is a real possibility you are deluded. You can not seal off a border. If you think you can good luck but you are destined to fail. You need to solve the cause of the problem, not treat the symptom. PS The military wants no part of your plans to seal the borders. They will not help or allow their assets to be borrowed for such a purpose. That's a fact you need to consider. This is something I consider much more important than any attempt to seal off the borders, and to be something that we should be able to accomplish.
U.S. ENGLISH, Inc.: Towards a United America - 7/26/2005 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 19, 2005 Contact: Rob Toonkel rtoonkel@usenglish.org (202) 833-0100 English Language Unity Act co-sponsor list climbs past 125 members H.R. 997 ranks among top 50 most widely supported bills in 109th Congress A flurry of co-sponsors in recent weeks has lifted H.R. 997, the English Language Unity Act of 2005 into the upper echelon of Congressional legislation. With 128 co-sponsors from 35 states, H.R. 997 has built a lengthy list of bipartisan supporters matched by few other measures. Introduced by Rep. Steve King (R-IA), the legislation would make English the official language of the United States. “More than 125 members of Congress and 75 percent of the population want official English legislation to get its opportunity in front of Congress,” said Mauro E. Mujica, Chairman of U.S. English, Inc. “I join with this enthusiastic majority in calling for a hearing on this important measure.” Passing the 125 co-sponsor mark is rarified air for a legislative proposal. While only 82, or 2.5 percent, of the more than 3,300 bills introduced this session have collected 100 co-sponsors, just 48, or 1.5 percent, of these have surged past 125 supporters. With only six months elapsed in the 109th Congress, H.R. 997 has already collected more co-sponsors than the English Language Unity Act of 2003 (also H.R. 997) in the entire 108th Congress. The bill is currently pending in the House Committee on the Judiciary as well as the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Official English measures have long been popular with the public and those elected to serve in Congress. For nearly a generation, polls have found support for making English the official language among four-fifths of the population, including a 2005 Zogby poll which pegged the rate at 79 percent. Since 1981, more than 550 Members of Congress representing all 50 states have sponsored, co-sponsored or voted for official English measures a total of more than 2,500 times. “It is through the backing of a common language that we will expand employment and educational opportunity, and continue successful immigrant integration,” continued Mujica. “Without a unifying language, we can never be truly one nation. I urge the House leadership to bring H.R. 997 up for a committee hearing without further delay.” |
|
